Yiming Dang vs Sakura Hosogi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 05:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Dang vs S. Hosogi

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dang 1 - 0 Hosogi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Yiming Dang winning 2 and Sakura Hosogi winning 1. The last match between Yiming Dang and Sakura Hosogi was at the W100 Incheon, 25-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-2 1-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dang | 1 |
| Hosogi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W100 Incheon(09-25-25)
Y. Dang vs S. Hosogi H2H Profile
Y. Dang vs S. Hosogi Match Preview:
- Yiming Dang's second serve win percentage is slightly higher at 39.28% compared to Sakura Hosogi's 36.74%. Could this edge give Dang a lead in tight situations?
- Both players perform fairly evenly in return games; Sakura Hosogi edges out slightly in winning second serve returns at 52.49%, versus Dang’s 52.00%.
- Sakura Hosogi is slightly stronger on first serve returns, achieving a 38.49% success rate over Dang's 36.71%.
- Under pressure, Yiming Dang excels at saving breakpoints with a rate of 49.06% compared to Hosogi’s 44.63%. Can Dang convert this into a consistent advantage?
- In terms of overall match wins in the past year, Sakura Hosogi has been more successful, winning 70.51% of matches compared to Dang’s 41.86%.
- Yiming Dang performs best on clay, whereas Sakura Hosogi is strong on grass. However, Dang’s weakest surface is indoor hard courts.
- Both players have been active in the Challengers/ITF tournaments. Hosogi has a notable win rate of 65.08% against Dang’s 50.00%.
- Dang has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average over the past year compared to Hosogi.
- In deciding sets, Hosogi appears stronger with a 69% success rate, surpassing Dang’s 31%.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
This match promises to be closely contested, with both players presenting specific strengths. Yiming Dang shows a slightly better second serve performance, which might provide a slight edge during crucial points. Additionally, Dang's proficiency in saving breakpoints under pressure could play a crucial role.
Despite this, Sakura Hosogi has demonstrated superior overall form, achieving a higher match win percentage over the last year. Her ability to excel on different surfaces, particularly on grass, suggests versatility in her gameplay.
The deciding factor could be their performance in deciding sets, where Hosogi has shown significant strength compared to Dang. Considering the overall stats and trends, it appears Sakura Hosogi is better positioned to secure victory in this upcoming match.
Ultimately, based on recent form and key statistics, Sakura Hosogi is most likely to win this matchup.
Yiming Dang vs Sakura Hosogi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Dang vs S. Hosogi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:18:21 | Average Match Time | 2:18:21 |
| 58% (63/108) | 1st Serve % | 68% (51/75) |
| 65% (41/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (34/51) |
| 40% (18/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (5/14) |
| 40% (30/75) | Return Points Win % | 45% (49/108) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Dang Recent Matches Played
S. Hosogi Recent Matches Played

Y. Dang vs S. Hosogi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.74% (44/64) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.76% (252/156) |
| 43.21% (105/138) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.55% (552/375) |
| 47.94% (1119/1215) | Games Win/Loss | 54.47% (4559/3810) |
| 41.67% (35/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (210/120) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (20/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 68.75% (11/5) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 182 | Aces Total | 190 |
| 0.58 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 662 | Total Double Faults | 999 |
| 1:37:16 | Average Match Time | 1:27:37 |
| 406.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 499.62 |
| 56% (3664/6572) | 1st Serve % | 70% (16755/23933) |
| 60% (2200/3664) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (9689/16755) |
| 40% (1171/2908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3224/7178) |
| 46% (385/846) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1761/3494) |
| 46% (3019/6575) | Return Points Win % | 49% (12124/24575) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 43.75% (35/45) | Challenger W/L | 57.51% (157/116) |
| 34.62% (9/17) | Futures W/L | 72.52% (95/36) |
| 40% (42/104) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (247/402) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 45% (14/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (37/75) |
| 38% (11/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (60/111) |
| 80% (51/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (234/212) |
| 20% (51/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (234/22) |
| 5% (57/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (174/39) |